NC’s Anti-LGBT Law and the Legislature: Little Business Sense

Apr 15, 2016   //   Politics, Tolerance, Top Story

 

As was posted in a recent article, I sent my objections to NC’s anti-LGBT law, House Bill 2 (HB2) to my elected representatives in the NC General Assembly with copy to leadership of both parties in the House and Senate.  Today,  I was published in the Raleigh News & Observer as a Letter to the Editor, taking on HB2 from a business perspective; that being client retention as an integral part of business development.  Comments issued by two of the state’s “most powerful” legislators, Nelson Dollar (R-Cary) and House Speaker Pro Tempore Paul ‘Skip’ Stam (R-Apex), demonstrated little understanding of the importance of customer retention in building the business base of their own state.  Discrimination can adversely affect business, as North Carolina’s governor and legislature are realizing with cancelled concerts, business expansion plans, conventions and more.  The text of the letter follows.

********

In your April 12 news article “Visitors bureau: HB2 hits region’s economy,” two of “the most powerful” state legislators, Reps. Nelson Dollar and Paul Stam, are cited as saying that if some customers back out of doing business in North Carolina that the state simply finds other customers.

Speaking from the perspective of having built a business in this state and having participated in the growth of a publicly held state business as a corporate officer, I think such flippant and irresponsible remarks demonstrate a blatant ignorance of business development and violate two fundamental rules.

First, central to business development is customer retention; one is looking to grow client base and get return business from existing customers. Let there be no doubt that North Carolina is a business looking to attract and keep customers. It is far more expensive to find new customers than market to existing ones.

Second, if a customer goes elsewhere based on a bad experience, one may never see that customer again. And word from just one dissatisfied customer travels fast and far as our governor and legislators have witnessed.

So much for the N.C. Republican Party touting itself as being the business-friendly party.

 

Recent Posts


The Cruelty of NCs House Bill 2

North Carolina’s House Bill 2 is fundamentally flawed. Quite the opposite of legislators bogus claims that public facility non-discrimination laws create safety concerns from sexual predators, the law actually increases the risk of abuse, both verbal and physical, to the already vulnerable transgender population. Further, in the state of NC that houses the Research Triangle Park and multiple world class medical institutions, legislators have pandered to religious factions and organizations that have stigmatized, ostracized and even demonized transgenders, some of whom suffer from a recognized medical diagnosis. The situation for transgendered youth is particularly grave, a population that already suffers a high rate of both abuse and suicide attempts. The law is cruel and untenable from both business and civil/human rights perspectives, and should be repealed.


NC’s Anti-LGBT Law and the Legislature: Little Business Sense

In this published Letter to the Editor (Raleigh N&O), powerful members of the North Carolina legislature have demonstrated little understanding of the importance of customer retention in building the business base of the state.


North Carolina’s LGBT Discrimination Law HB2: Its Folly and Motivation

By using sex on a birth certificate to define sexual identity, NC’s legislature and governor have shown much ignorance about the complexities of biologic diversity. But it is the pandering to LGBT hate groups by ranking members of the GOP at both the national and state level that reveals the underlying discrimination that motivated the law.

Featured Article


The Year the GOPs Con Game was Exposed

The GOP’s decision to reinstate tax cut policy in 2001 exposed their hand. It was not about deficit reduction, growing the economy, or job creation. It was about ideology and, no doubt, special interests. It was a backdoor approach where government revenue was cut in an attempt to curtail spending on popular programs they otherwise could not take head-on. This while obstructing the work of Congress, spinning a web of deceit about the benefits of their policy, and weakening our country’s financial standing. It’s time to play hardball during ‘fiscal cliff’ negotiations and force them to be specific about what spending cuts they are talking about to offset the tax benefits they wish to preserve for the wealthiest. They wouldn’t have the nerve.