What We Gave Away in 2001

Sep 7, 2010   //   Politics

I sent two e-mails to Squawk Box regarding  economic outcomes in the year 2000.  The slides that accompanied both communications (and trail this blog entry) were derived from OMB data and were included in a seminar I gave in March, 2010 entitled “National Debt, Tax Policy and the Economy from an Investment Perspective”.

June 28, 2010

We had the following outcomes in the year 2000 (see slides below); this included three years of surpluses (1998-2000), the first time that occurred since the late 1940’s.  So if debt was a concern, why did we return to unfunded tax cuts, an unfunded entitlement program…especially after supply-side policies quadrupled our gross national debt between 1981-1992?  Additionally, although supply-side policy was supposed to get the government to cut spending (Starve the Beast), neither party has shown the political will to cut defense spending, Medicare/Medicaid/CHIP, Social Security, and Safety Net Programs – those in addition to the interest account for 80% of our federal spending (NASA at a fraction of one percent of our spending becomes the sacrificial lamb).  The successful business I built in the 1990’s put me in the upper 1% of income earners in this country and I understood that the upper 5 percent of America holds 70% of this country’s financial wealth; and that with dividends and capital gains being taxed at a lower rate than ordinary income, that we paid a lower overall tax rate than did middle America – I had no problem in paying a larger tax load in the 1990’s.  It seems to me we gave away a lot for greed.


August 25, 2010

Just listened to Gov. Pataki.  I have looked at the economic/tax policies of both parties in regard to outcomes and vision, and the Republican Party policies have more than fallen short.  It is a shame to have given away the outcomes we had in the year 2000 – listed below from a lecture I gave earlier this year.  At first opportunity under a Republican president, House, and Senate, this country went back to the same supply-side economic/tax policies that quadrupled national gross national debt between 1981-1992.  I can understand trying something, but after a comparison of outcomes it was unforgivable to give what we had away that year.  The 1990’s are cited as the longest period of growth in US history.

Economic Outcomes 2000 (1)

Economic Outcomes 2000 (2)Economic Outcomes 2000 (3)

Recent Posts

The Cruelty of NCs House Bill 2

North Carolina’s House Bill 2 is fundamentally flawed. Quite the opposite of legislators bogus claims that public facility non-discrimination laws create safety concerns from sexual predators, the law actually increases the risk of abuse, both verbal and physical, to the already vulnerable transgender population. Further, in the state of NC that houses the Research Triangle Park and multiple world class medical institutions, legislators have pandered to religious factions and organizations that have stigmatized, ostracized and even demonized transgenders, some of whom suffer from a recognized medical diagnosis. The situation for transgendered youth is particularly grave, a population that already suffers a high rate of both abuse and suicide attempts. The law is cruel and untenable from both business and civil/human rights perspectives, and should be repealed.

NC’s Anti-LGBT Law and the Legislature: Little Business Sense

In this published Letter to the Editor (Raleigh N&O), powerful members of the North Carolina legislature have demonstrated little understanding of the importance of customer retention in building the business base of the state.

North Carolina’s LGBT Discrimination Law HB2: Its Folly and Motivation

By using sex on a birth certificate to define sexual identity, NC’s legislature and governor have shown much ignorance about the complexities of biologic diversity. But it is the pandering to LGBT hate groups by ranking members of the GOP at both the national and state level that reveals the underlying discrimination that motivated the law.

Featured Article

The Year the GOPs Con Game was Exposed

The GOP’s decision to reinstate tax cut policy in 2001 exposed their hand. It was not about deficit reduction, growing the economy, or job creation. It was about ideology and, no doubt, special interests. It was a backdoor approach where government revenue was cut in an attempt to curtail spending on popular programs they otherwise could not take head-on. This while obstructing the work of Congress, spinning a web of deceit about the benefits of their policy, and weakening our country’s financial standing. It’s time to play hardball during ‘fiscal cliff’ negotiations and force them to be specific about what spending cuts they are talking about to offset the tax benefits they wish to preserve for the wealthiest. They wouldn’t have the nerve.