The Mosque Conflict: Putting the Shoe on the Other Foot

Sep 5, 2010   //   Politics, Tolerance

I issued the following e-mail to MSNBC’s Hardball that was providing debate on the building of a Mosque/Muslim Community Center near Ground Zero in Southern Manhattan.  It must be understood that innocent Muslims were also killed in that senseless act of violence on 9/11.  In the following communication I go through the exercise of having opponents put the shoe on the other foot by considering the violent acts perpetrated by a fringe holding fundamentalist Christian beliefs and whether that should be grounds for denying the building of Christian churches or community centers in areas where acts of violence have occurred.

August 31, 2010

In this country there have been 41 documented cases where abortion clinics have been bombed and numerous other instances of violent behavior directed at abortion providers that have claimed the lives of innocent people.  These atrocities have been largely perpetrated by those with fundamentalist Christian beliefs who believed they were ridding the world of sinners and stopping the ‘holocaust of lost lives’ (the words of Eric Rudolph although he denied a religious motive).  We have recently had a Christian militia in Michigan stopped before it could carry out its plans to kill a police officer so that they could slay numerous others who would show up at the funeral.  Violent behavior by Christians in the name of Christianity has been around for centuries including the Inquisitions and the Crusades.  Therefore, should we not prevent the construction of Christian churches or Christian community centers in the areas where these atrocities have been committed?  (If one wants to make the argument that 9/11 was different because of the number of lost lives, what is the cut-off for when it does make a difference?).

The problem with the above is that it paints an entire faith by the actions of a few crazed individuals.  Similarly, we should not be punishing all of Islam, nor coloring the perception of 1.5 billion Muslims world-wide, based on the actions of a misguided fringe, just as we would not punish all of Christianity because of the acts of a few.   It simply takes putting the shoe on the other foot.  In a similar vein, I certainly do hope that cooler heads prevail to prevent the plans of a Christian minister to burn multiple copies of the Qur’an on the anniversary of 9/11 – again, putting the shoe on the other foot, how would Christians feel about their holy book being burned en masse – such an action would play right into the hands of the extremists.

Recent Posts


The Cruelty of NCs House Bill 2

North Carolina’s House Bill 2 is fundamentally flawed. Quite the opposite of legislators bogus claims that public facility non-discrimination laws create safety concerns from sexual predators, the law actually increases the risk of abuse, both verbal and physical, to the already vulnerable transgender population. Further, in the state of NC that houses the Research Triangle Park and multiple world class medical institutions, legislators have pandered to religious factions and organizations that have stigmatized, ostracized and even demonized transgenders, some of whom suffer from a recognized medical diagnosis. The situation for transgendered youth is particularly grave, a population that already suffers a high rate of both abuse and suicide attempts. The law is cruel and untenable from both business and civil/human rights perspectives, and should be repealed.


NC’s Anti-LGBT Law and the Legislature: Little Business Sense

In this published Letter to the Editor (Raleigh N&O), powerful members of the North Carolina legislature have demonstrated little understanding of the importance of customer retention in building the business base of the state.


North Carolina’s LGBT Discrimination Law HB2: Its Folly and Motivation

By using sex on a birth certificate to define sexual identity, NC’s legislature and governor have shown much ignorance about the complexities of biologic diversity. But it is the pandering to LGBT hate groups by ranking members of the GOP at both the national and state level that reveals the underlying discrimination that motivated the law.

Featured Article


The Year the GOPs Con Game was Exposed

The GOP’s decision to reinstate tax cut policy in 2001 exposed their hand. It was not about deficit reduction, growing the economy, or job creation. It was about ideology and, no doubt, special interests. It was a backdoor approach where government revenue was cut in an attempt to curtail spending on popular programs they otherwise could not take head-on. This while obstructing the work of Congress, spinning a web of deceit about the benefits of their policy, and weakening our country’s financial standing. It’s time to play hardball during ‘fiscal cliff’ negotiations and force them to be specific about what spending cuts they are talking about to offset the tax benefits they wish to preserve for the wealthiest. They wouldn’t have the nerve.