The Best Healthcare System? Depends Who You Are

Sep 5, 2010   //   Healthcare

Co-Host Joe Kernen (CNBC’s Squawk Box) had the unfortunate experience of requiring emergency surgery for appendicitis.  Upon his recovery and return to the show, he used his experience as evidence that America has best healthcare system.  He has been a vocal opponent to the Health Reform Legislation, referring to it as ‘Obamacare’ and used his personal experience to support his position.  During this past year I spent many months staying in my wife’s hospital room as she underwent numerous difficult treatments to bring her leukemia into remission.  We both heard about cases in that microcosm of healthcare involving the very real loss of life in this country due to lack of access to essential care.  And with Mary being uninsurable under current health insurance practice, we also lived with the uncertainty as to whether she might be declined a second transplant should treatment succeed in putting her into remission.  The protests in Washington, that were being covered on television, were so hate filled regarding the nature of placards/language/violence (threats to elected officials and their families, bricks being thrown through windows), actions that clearly went beyond any reasonable objection to the legislation, led my wife to turn off the TV as she said she needed to remain positive as she fought for her life.  It was in light of this personal experience I issued the following comment to the show.

August 11, 2010

Yes, Joe was in and out with great care; and the system is pulling a rabbit out of the hat with my wife regarding an opportunity to beat an aggressive leukemia as she reports to transplant today.  But we can afford a great insurance policy, as I’m sure Joe has as well.  However, during my stays in the hospital this year with my wife, staff relayed to us the other side:  the young man whose insurance declined a transplant with the institution requiring a quarter of a million in the account – he tried fundraising but eventually lost his life; the individual who was declining his dinner trays to save on benefits – my wife unable to eat her dinner wanted to donate her tray only to be told ‘he’s no longer with us’.  We heard, within that microcosm of healthcare, the statistics that show 45,000 American citizens each year are dying (more than auto accidents and homicides combined) because of lack of access to essential care.  I saw the look of anguish on the faces of families I got to know who had lost a loved one, and that awful feeling was haunting me as well.  I can not turn my back on the less fortunate of our society and we need solutions.  And with no effort under a Republican controlled presidency and Congress to address the healthcare issue, with the final bill not containing the ‘public option’ or the buy-in to Medicare down to age 55, with it containing the top three Republican priorities (per John Boehner) of an exchange, ability to buy across state lines, and the option for the states to opt out, and with a mandate that was actually proposed in the past by Republicans…to say that we needed to scrap the entire bill and start with a clean piece of paper was disingenuous politics – there is no interest as shown by both action and word to address the plight of the less fortunate in our society.  The bill is imperfect, but at least it is a step forward.

Recent Posts


Gun Violence and Human Rights: Welcome to the Family

With two separate human rights committees declaring this year that rampant gun violence in the United States constitutes a violation of our government’s duty to protect life, gun violence finds itself as being but one member in a family of related disorders in our country. It is beyond coincidence that all disproportionately affect the same victims and that all are fostered by the same hateful and discriminatory ideology held on the political right. Although other members of this family claim far more lives than does gun violence, it is the dramatic and highly publicized nature of major gun violence events that raises public outrage as well as tens of millions of dollars in funding. Our country now has the demography to weaponize human rights in our political process. And gun violence prevention, with its resources and political connections, can accomplish much more than just its own cause, and far more quickly, by simply changing its focus.


Gun Violence Prevention and the Democratic Party: A Tactical Abyss

Is the gun violence prevention movement really taking head-on an issue that is held by as little as 2% of the American public as being the most important factor in voting for Congress? Both Democratic candidates and gun violence prevention advocates ignored the market while failing to energize important segments of their customer base this past election. Until the gun violence prevention movement re-positions its product into one that better resonates with what is driving voters during elections, the issue will continue to be a largely inconsequential one in shaping Congress. But the movement also needs the help of Democratic candidates to light the fires.


Placing Gun Violence into a Human Rights Framework: Our Moral Imperative

Today’s gun violence prevention movement has developed the organizational structures, political connections and deep financial pockets to impact both Congress and public opinion. The use those resources to inject human rights into our political dialog, along with the voices of Congressional allies, becomes a moral imperative for our leaders.

Featured Article


The Year the GOPs Con Game was Exposed

The GOP’s decision to reinstate tax cut policy in 2001 exposed their hand. It was not about deficit reduction, growing the economy, or job creation. It was about ideology and, no doubt, special interests. It was a backdoor approach where government revenue was cut in an attempt to curtail spending on popular programs they otherwise could not take head-on. This while obstructing the work of Congress, spinning a web of deceit about the benefits of their policy, and weakening our country’s financial standing. It’s time to play hardball during ‘fiscal cliff’ negotiations and force them to be specific about what spending cuts they are talking about to offset the tax benefits they wish to preserve for the wealthiest. They wouldn’t have the nerve.