Obamacare? A Derogatory and Undeserved Name

Sep 5, 2010   //   Healthcare, Politics

Past Governor George Pataki (R-NY) was a guest on CNBC’s Squawk Box and is an opponent of the healthcare reform legislation.  The segment also included former Governor Howard Dean (D-VT) as a proponent of the legislation.  Governor Pataki referred to the legislation as ‘Obamacare’, a derogatory term that has been used by other opponents as well.  As the legislation was actually highly debated and contains numerous ideas that have been presented by Republicans both recently and in the past, I issued the following comment.

August 25, 2010

Listened to Govs Pataki and Dean.  With both parties having said they recognize the importance of health insurance reform, why this bill is called Obamacare is beyond me -

Obama supported the ‘public option’ – that is out
Medicare buy-in to age 55, not supported by the Republicans is out.
The top 3 priorities identified by John Boehner (exchange, buy across state lines, and ability for states to opt out) are in
The mandate has been a Republican idea and part of Mitt Romney’s MA program.

With a Republican president and a Republican controlled Congress not addressing this issue when they had the chance indicates no real desire to tackle the matter.  For the Republlicans to say they supported reform but that we needed to scrap the entire bill and start with a clean sheet of paper after a year of negotiation is disingenuous politics, as is calling this legislation Obamacare.

Recent Posts


The Cruelty of NCs House Bill 2

North Carolina’s House Bill 2 is fundamentally flawed. Quite the opposite of legislators bogus claims that public facility non-discrimination laws create safety concerns from sexual predators, the law actually increases the risk of abuse, both verbal and physical, to the already vulnerable transgender population. Further, in the state of NC that houses the Research Triangle Park and multiple world class medical institutions, legislators have pandered to religious factions and organizations that have stigmatized, ostracized and even demonized transgenders, some of whom suffer from a recognized medical diagnosis. The situation for transgendered youth is particularly grave, a population that already suffers a high rate of both abuse and suicide attempts. The law is cruel and untenable from both business and civil/human rights perspectives, and should be repealed.


NC’s Anti-LGBT Law and the Legislature: Little Business Sense

In this published Letter to the Editor (Raleigh N&O), powerful members of the North Carolina legislature have demonstrated little understanding of the importance of customer retention in building the business base of the state.


North Carolina’s LGBT Discrimination Law HB2: Its Folly and Motivation

By using sex on a birth certificate to define sexual identity, NC’s legislature and governor have shown much ignorance about the complexities of biologic diversity. But it is the pandering to LGBT hate groups by ranking members of the GOP at both the national and state level that reveals the underlying discrimination that motivated the law.

Featured Article


The Year the GOPs Con Game was Exposed

The GOP’s decision to reinstate tax cut policy in 2001 exposed their hand. It was not about deficit reduction, growing the economy, or job creation. It was about ideology and, no doubt, special interests. It was a backdoor approach where government revenue was cut in an attempt to curtail spending on popular programs they otherwise could not take head-on. This while obstructing the work of Congress, spinning a web of deceit about the benefits of their policy, and weakening our country’s financial standing. It’s time to play hardball during ‘fiscal cliff’ negotiations and force them to be specific about what spending cuts they are talking about to offset the tax benefits they wish to preserve for the wealthiest. They wouldn’t have the nerve.