The White Coat Count

Mar 18, 2010   //   Healthcare, Personal

My wife’s stay at Duke Hospital during her first bout with leukemia in 2005 made for a long and challenging summer.  I stayed in her room using a recliner chair as a bed during the ordeal.  Although we both hold in high regard the treatment unit’s staff and clinicians, the floor can indeed be a challenging, intimidating and frightening experience for many patients who learn the outcomes of others while also coping with their own mortality.  My roles included support, advocacy, chief cheerleader, and using my clinical research background to review lab reports, talk with physicians, and add a voice of encouragement.  Mary was quite the fighter and with the support of family, friends and the faculty/staff we prevailed.

That summer I took to extensive reading, not just news related, but a bit of fiction as well including 9 Stephen King works (my youngest son was quite a Stephen King fan and thought that I might find the books to be a useful escape – it did give us new ground for discussion as I had never read any of King’s works).  One of the books was entitled ‘On Writing’ where King discusses his approach to writing.  He often begins a work without knowing where it will lead and describes the process as being akin to an archeologist who continues to uncover more of a dig as it is unearthed.  The book did stir my creative side.

One day during our long stay on the hall, where on a daily basis I was following white cell counts (often quite low) during my wife’s recovery, she asked me took out the door of her room to see if her physician was available.  I found the hall empty at which point I uttered under my breath “The white coat count is quite low”.  The analogy to the human system literally hit me like a thunderbolt, a mix of insight and humor that simultaneously led to both awe and chuckles.  I left shortly to make one of my infrequent trips back to our home where I collected mail, did laundry and performed some other routine maintenance chores.  During the trip down I-40 the entire analogy flew through my mind and during a load of laundry I committed the piece to paper – about a 20-30 minute process.  I spun a copy to bring back to the unit.

I handed the piece, with a grin, to a nurse with whom we had developed a strong relationship, and it quickly circulated around the hall.  It found its way to the faculty that issued positive and humorous remarks to me about it.  The staff framed the piece and it now hangs in the cancer unit.  A member of the faculty submitted it to the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) as a contribution from a family member of a patient.

Mary and I are now entering the fray once again against this stubborn enemy and it is our belief that the system, described in the piece below, will once again prove to be effective.

*****************************************************************

The White Coat Count

My wife asked me look into the hallway to see if her physician was nearby.  Upon opening the door to her hospital room and looking down the hallway, nary a white coat was in sight.  The ‘White Coat Count’ was quite low.  It was at that point it dawned on me the close parallels that exist between the hospital floor and our own bodies in the fight against disease.

The White Coat Count was low because, like good white cells, the physicians had left the vasculature (hallways) and migrated into the tissues (rooms) where they performed their important role in fighting disease.  The nursing staff, like helper T-cells, closely interacted with disease (patients) and other white cells (coats), acquiring and transmitting information thus fulfilling their vital role in coordinating the response.  The housekeeping staff, like so many macrophages, traveled through the vasculature (hallways) penetrating into the tissues (rooms) removing debris thus keeping the tissue clean.  The food service staff transported nutrients through the vasculature depositing them into the tissues.  And we, the relatives of the patients, appear to play the role of therapeutic agents in this analogy, assisting and supporting the response.  I noticed a range dosage schedules for the therapeutic agents (visitors) on the hall varying from QD to BID to PRN and, in my case, continuous infusion.  It would seem that the choice of visitor would be as important as the choice of therapeutic agent as either could provide benefit or, as I’m sure we all know, be capable of eliciting an emetogenic response, hypertension, or some other untoward event.  Finally, in this analogy, if we are to consider the nursing stations and central offices of Suite 9100 as the brain of this entity, we therapeutic agents have little capacity to cross the blood-brain barrier and if found there would be expected to be in very low concentration.

It would seem that a system that so closely mimics the body’s own processes would be effective in fighting disease.

Arthur R. Kamm, Ph.D.

July, 2005

Tags:

Recent Posts

In Defense of the Assault Weapons Ban

The finding that the AR-15 rifle was being actively selected for premeditated indiscriminate mass killings in 2012 fundamentally changes the debate regarding Senator Feinstein’s Assault Weapons Ban. Not only does this finding take this weapon and mass shootings beyond anecdotal observations, it has predictive value. We now know with certainty that there will be another horrific premeditated and planned mass killing involving this weapon or another having similar rapid fire and high capacity capability. And it will be difficult to defend against as we cannot predict the timing, the venue, or the selected targets. It is clear that both the weaponry and background checks on all buyers should be addressed to reduce the opportunity for, and carnage of, future premeditated indiscriminate mass shootings. This should become a fundamental part of the upcoming debate on the Senate floor. Should meaningful gun control legislation fail in the Senate, for those senators who opposed there is little doubt that some would have swallowed a ‘poison pill’ regarding their political career.

Selection of the AR-15 Rifle in Premeditated Indiscriminate Mass Shootings

A total of four independent, premeditated and indiscriminate mass shootings occurred in the latter half of 2012. There was no connection between the shooters and the victims, and no reason was established in the selection of victims other than inflicting mass casualties. An AR-15 rifle was the weapon used in all four of these events. The odds of this particular weapon being selected for all four of these independent events simply by chance was estimated to be less than one in a million using two different approaches. The intentional selection of this firearm is additionally supported by the behavior of all four shooters. It is felt that this finding fundamentally changes the assault weapon debate. It is not that this weapon was simply being used at these events, there is little if any doubt that it was being intentionally selected as a weapon of choice in those premeditated indiscriminate mass killings. As this weapon is being actively sought for these events, leaving it unregulated and expanding public availability could only increase the opportunity for its use in future mass shootings of the nature we witnessed in 2012.

The Problem with Congress? Look No Further Than the Gun Debate

With 11 of the 18 Senate Judiciary Committee members benefitting from gun lobby financial contributions, the impartiality of both their opinion and eventual votes is drawn into question. The Newtown incident has laid bare, as no other has in the past, the inherent conflict lawmakers face regarding their obligation to legislate in the public’s best interest versus special interest pressures that threaten their ability to retain office. This current debate has morphed into something larger than regulating the gun market. It provides clear evidence that our Congress needs to fundamentally change the way it operates.

Featured Article

The Year the GOPs Con Game was Exposed

The GOP’s decision to reinstate tax cut policy in 2001 exposed their hand. It was not about deficit reduction, growing the economy, or job creation. It was about ideology and, no doubt, special interests. It was a backdoor approach where government revenue was cut in an attempt to curtail spending on popular programs they otherwise could not take head-on. This while obstructing the work of Congress, spinning a web of deceit about the benefits of their policy, and weakening our country’s financial standing. It’s time to play hardball during ‘fiscal cliff’ negotiations and force them to be specific about what spending cuts they are talking about to offset the tax benefits they wish to preserve for the wealthiest. They wouldn’t have the nerve.