Have Our Lawmakers Crossed Ethical, Even Legal, Bounds

Nov 16, 2009   //   Healthcare, Politics

When I worked at the executive level in the health industry we had to adhere to strict rules regarding behavior with government agencies.  Corporate legal instructed us to be completely hands off, not even offering to pick up a lunch as the government officials would have declined such offers anyway (at least they should have and we never did).  In giving testimony before government panels, individuals both on the panel as well as presenting before the panel were required to give complete financial disclosure.  If a government official in the deliberations was found to be not only in receipt of financial contributions from the industry, but was also placing not their words but the verbatim words of a corporation and its agents into the record as if they were their own, it would have constituted a scandal of the highest order.

I’m grappling with this regarding our elected lawmakers.  Several of them directly involved with the drafting of healthcare legislation have accepted large sums of money from the industry.  These monies will be used to the benefit of those lawmakers in that it will support their re-election efforts with the attendant salary and benefits (paid for by our tax dollars).  But more than that, some lawmakers are placing not their words into the Congressional Record, but the words supplied by agents of a corporation that has a vested interest in the outcome of the legislation as was revealed in Richard Pear’s recent NY Times article (1).  I have heard the arguments regarding lobbying and first amendment rights regarding free speech, but I believe that line may have been crossed when lawmakers were entering not their words, but the words of corporate agents into the record as if they were their own.  One might try to dance around this matter, but it stinks.

It is hard to imagine that this behavior remains within ethical bounds or perhaps even legal bounds considering the oath these lawmakers took upon taking office.  Certainly they provided no disclosure of the source of the language that was placed into the record.  Of interest, Owen Brewster (R-ME) who was ‘in bed’ with Juan Trippe of Pan Am in the post WWII era (the airline having been involved in the writing of legislation to give it a monopoly in international travel) was accused of corruption and gave up his chair during the hearings centered around Hughes’ corporation (a competitor to Pan Am) and its use of government funding during the war.

We should not have our elected officials in any conflicts regarding the importance of this legislation as studies have shown that American citizens are dying each day because they have reduced access to good care.

I for one am writing both media as well as some elected officials I trust to look into this matter.  It is hard for me to imagine that an investigation is not warranted regarding the practices of some lawmakers.

Sources

1. In House, Many Spoke With One Voice: Lobbyists’, Richard Pear, NY Times, Nov 14, 2009

Recent Posts


The Cruelty of NCs House Bill 2

North Carolina’s House Bill 2 is fundamentally flawed. Quite the opposite of legislators bogus claims that public facility non-discrimination laws create safety concerns from sexual predators, the law actually increases the risk of abuse, both verbal and physical, to the already vulnerable transgender population. Further, in the state of NC that houses the Research Triangle Park and multiple world class medical institutions, legislators have pandered to religious factions and organizations that have stigmatized, ostracized and even demonized transgenders, some of whom suffer from a recognized medical diagnosis. The situation for transgendered youth is particularly grave, a population that already suffers a high rate of both abuse and suicide attempts. The law is cruel and untenable from both business and civil/human rights perspectives, and should be repealed.


NC’s Anti-LGBT Law and the Legislature: Little Business Sense

In this published Letter to the Editor (Raleigh N&O), powerful members of the North Carolina legislature have demonstrated little understanding of the importance of customer retention in building the business base of the state.


North Carolina’s LGBT Discrimination Law HB2: Its Folly and Motivation

By using sex on a birth certificate to define sexual identity, NC’s legislature and governor have shown much ignorance about the complexities of biologic diversity. But it is the pandering to LGBT hate groups by ranking members of the GOP at both the national and state level that reveals the underlying discrimination that motivated the law.

Featured Article


The Year the GOPs Con Game was Exposed

The GOP’s decision to reinstate tax cut policy in 2001 exposed their hand. It was not about deficit reduction, growing the economy, or job creation. It was about ideology and, no doubt, special interests. It was a backdoor approach where government revenue was cut in an attempt to curtail spending on popular programs they otherwise could not take head-on. This while obstructing the work of Congress, spinning a web of deceit about the benefits of their policy, and weakening our country’s financial standing. It’s time to play hardball during ‘fiscal cliff’ negotiations and force them to be specific about what spending cuts they are talking about to offset the tax benefits they wish to preserve for the wealthiest. They wouldn’t have the nerve.