Cost Conundrums – Published Letter

Nov 1, 2009   //   Healthcare

I have received encouragement from some who have read this blog to submit my health insurance reform position to the press for publication.  A letter I submitted made the Sunday Forum in today’s (Nov 1, 2009) edition of Raleigh’s News & Observer (N&O).  The paper edits letters for space and so it does not contain the full submitted text (and the title, Cost Conundrums, is theirs), but the major point is made. The article was published by the N&O on the net as well and the link is:

http://www.newsobserver.com/opinion/letters/story/166406.html

I have additionally sent links to articles I have written to our elected officials.  The free press is a wonderful part of our system that permits civil participation in debate.

Many thanks for the suggestions and comments that have been sent to me.  Again, feel free to post comments directly on articles of interest – that can be done anonymously by using a ‘handle’ rather than your real name should you wish.  That might get some dialogue going which is one of the objectives of the blog.

The text as copied from the posting follows.

Art

******************

Cost Conundrums

Between the ages of 55 and 60, my health insurance premium has increased 150 percent, from less than $650 per month to over $1,600 per month, approaching $20,000 per year to keep the same level of benefits we had just five years ago.

I am self-employed and in 2005 my wife developed an acute leukemia and is fortunately in remission. But she would be uninsurable should we lose our health insurance, and she is years away from being Medicare-eligible.

Medical care contributes to longevity. As we get older we are more likely to develop serious life-threatening illness and yet as we age health insurance premiums rise. This can result in reduction in benefits or perhaps even the inability to afford insurance at all when people need it the most.

The ability to obtain health insurance in our country should not be determined on the basis of profit risk to an industry. There should be an option for the less fortunate of our citizens and something that controls cost as our citizens age.

Dr. Art Kamm

Apex

Recent Posts


The Cruelty of NCs House Bill 2

North Carolina’s House Bill 2 is fundamentally flawed. Quite the opposite of legislators bogus claims that public facility non-discrimination laws create safety concerns from sexual predators, the law actually increases the risk of abuse, both verbal and physical, to the already vulnerable transgender population. Further, in the state of NC that houses the Research Triangle Park and multiple world class medical institutions, legislators have pandered to religious factions and organizations that have stigmatized, ostracized and even demonized transgenders, some of whom suffer from a recognized medical diagnosis. The situation for transgendered youth is particularly grave, a population that already suffers a high rate of both abuse and suicide attempts. The law is cruel and untenable from both business and civil/human rights perspectives, and should be repealed.


NC’s Anti-LGBT Law and the Legislature: Little Business Sense

In this published Letter to the Editor (Raleigh N&O), powerful members of the North Carolina legislature have demonstrated little understanding of the importance of customer retention in building the business base of the state.


North Carolina’s LGBT Discrimination Law HB2: Its Folly and Motivation

By using sex on a birth certificate to define sexual identity, NC’s legislature and governor have shown much ignorance about the complexities of biologic diversity. But it is the pandering to LGBT hate groups by ranking members of the GOP at both the national and state level that reveals the underlying discrimination that motivated the law.

Featured Article


The Year the GOPs Con Game was Exposed

The GOP’s decision to reinstate tax cut policy in 2001 exposed their hand. It was not about deficit reduction, growing the economy, or job creation. It was about ideology and, no doubt, special interests. It was a backdoor approach where government revenue was cut in an attempt to curtail spending on popular programs they otherwise could not take head-on. This while obstructing the work of Congress, spinning a web of deceit about the benefits of their policy, and weakening our country’s financial standing. It’s time to play hardball during ‘fiscal cliff’ negotiations and force them to be specific about what spending cuts they are talking about to offset the tax benefits they wish to preserve for the wealthiest. They wouldn’t have the nerve.