President Obama’s Nobel Peace Prize

Oct 9, 2009   //   Politics

I interrupted my writing of an article on human physical diversity to write this short piece following the announcement of President Obama’s Nobel Peace Prize.  My background in leadership and communication practices is briefly outlined under the About section of this blog.  To be frank, I was literally ‘blown away’ as they say following the delivery of his June 2009 speech in Cairo to the Muslim world and submitted an Op-Ed piece regarding his command of specific leadership and communication skills that are used in building commitment.  It has been published on this blog (see ‘Understanding Obama’s Appeal: Leadership and Communication Skills’).

For far too long America has used positional leadership practices, ie dictating from a position of power, in its dealings around the world.  This leadership style is known to be poor at developing commitment, can cause hard feelings, resentment and can even result in an atmosphere of fear and mistrust.  President Obama approached the Muslim audience from the perspective of meeting upper level human needs, a leadership style that builds commitment and forms trust.  This leadership style, especially coming from the leader of the free world, should be a door opener for starting dialogue towards peace and conflict resolution.

Colin Powell, in his support of Mr. Obama’s candidacy, described him as a ‘transformational figure’.  The broad-based acceptance he enjoys at both home and abroad is evidence of a leadership style that indeed can transcend cultures and unite diverse groups.  Although early in his presidency, my belief is that this award is recognition of those skill sets and will hopefully bolster his credentials in uniting people both at home and abroad.  But with this award he also carries a heavy burden of expectation and he deserves and needs our support if we are to be successful in further uniting mankind.  He indeed opened the door for dialogue with his Cairo speech – may all take the opportunity to step through it.

Recent Posts


The Cruelty of NCs House Bill 2

North Carolina’s House Bill 2 is fundamentally flawed. Quite the opposite of legislators bogus claims that public facility non-discrimination laws create safety concerns from sexual predators, the law actually increases the risk of abuse, both verbal and physical, to the already vulnerable transgender population. Further, in the state of NC that houses the Research Triangle Park and multiple world class medical institutions, legislators have pandered to religious factions and organizations that have stigmatized, ostracized and even demonized transgenders, some of whom suffer from a recognized medical diagnosis. The situation for transgendered youth is particularly grave, a population that already suffers a high rate of both abuse and suicide attempts. The law is cruel and untenable from both business and civil/human rights perspectives, and should be repealed.


NC’s Anti-LGBT Law and the Legislature: Little Business Sense

In this published Letter to the Editor (Raleigh N&O), powerful members of the North Carolina legislature have demonstrated little understanding of the importance of customer retention in building the business base of the state.


North Carolina’s LGBT Discrimination Law HB2: Its Folly and Motivation

By using sex on a birth certificate to define sexual identity, NC’s legislature and governor have shown much ignorance about the complexities of biologic diversity. But it is the pandering to LGBT hate groups by ranking members of the GOP at both the national and state level that reveals the underlying discrimination that motivated the law.

Featured Article


The Year the GOPs Con Game was Exposed

The GOP’s decision to reinstate tax cut policy in 2001 exposed their hand. It was not about deficit reduction, growing the economy, or job creation. It was about ideology and, no doubt, special interests. It was a backdoor approach where government revenue was cut in an attempt to curtail spending on popular programs they otherwise could not take head-on. This while obstructing the work of Congress, spinning a web of deceit about the benefits of their policy, and weakening our country’s financial standing. It’s time to play hardball during ‘fiscal cliff’ negotiations and force them to be specific about what spending cuts they are talking about to offset the tax benefits they wish to preserve for the wealthiest. They wouldn’t have the nerve.