Intolerant Behavior and the Media – Published Letter

Oct 12, 2009   //   Healthcare, Tolerance

The following was published on-line by the Raleigh News & Observer: http://blogs.newsobserver.com/opinion/health-care-reform-rage-relentless-0.

I wrote the piece after attending a town hall meeting on healthcare reform in Durham, NC in August with a friend where we witnessed an individual assaulted in the audience and the meeting disrupted by individuals shouting ‘liberty’ and ‘freedom’.   This behavior is indeed misplaced as the very fact that such a meeting was taking place, where individuals could ask questions and express opinion, was an expression of the liberties and freedoms that we enjoy in this country.  But, of more concern is that intolerant behavior is being expressed in more dangerous ways around our country and I discuss the role that certain elements of media have played in stoking the fires of intolerance and manipulating fear.Letter:

Intolerant behavior is seen in public meetings on health insurance reform where speakers have been shouted down.  More seriously, it is being expressed as a reported 400 percent increase in death threats to President Obama over that of President Bush, a rise in anti-government militias and loaded weapons appearing at public forums.

Although most share a genuine passion on both sides of the health-care debate, elements of the media have been gaming intolerance, and that is dangerous practice. Rush Limbaugh has a long history of issuing racially offensive language that cost him his job at ESPN in 2003. He has, for example, used the term halfrican American and played a tune called “Barack the Magic Negro” on his show. He has gamed intolerance and then tells his audience that he hopes this president fails. Glenn Beck (Fox News) has drawn comparison between the Democratic and Nazi parties. There are those who believe this absurdity, and pictures are circulated of Obama sporting a Hitler-style mustache and talk of death squads as part of the proposed legislation.

The behavior is destructive, divisive and even dangerous. It is counterproductive to achieving a meaningful national dialogue on social issues. Although some defend the right of the media to issue such rhetoric, we as a public, and corporations, have no obligation to condone, support or sponsor this brand of irresponsible journalism.

Recent Posts


The Cruelty of NCs House Bill 2

North Carolina’s House Bill 2 is fundamentally flawed. Quite the opposite of legislators bogus claims that public facility non-discrimination laws create safety concerns from sexual predators, the law actually increases the risk of abuse, both verbal and physical, to the already vulnerable transgender population. Further, in the state of NC that houses the Research Triangle Park and multiple world class medical institutions, legislators have pandered to religious factions and organizations that have stigmatized, ostracized and even demonized transgenders, some of whom suffer from a recognized medical diagnosis. The situation for transgendered youth is particularly grave, a population that already suffers a high rate of both abuse and suicide attempts. The law is cruel and untenable from both business and civil/human rights perspectives, and should be repealed.


NC’s Anti-LGBT Law and the Legislature: Little Business Sense

In this published Letter to the Editor (Raleigh N&O), powerful members of the North Carolina legislature have demonstrated little understanding of the importance of customer retention in building the business base of the state.


North Carolina’s LGBT Discrimination Law HB2: Its Folly and Motivation

By using sex on a birth certificate to define sexual identity, NC’s legislature and governor have shown much ignorance about the complexities of biologic diversity. But it is the pandering to LGBT hate groups by ranking members of the GOP at both the national and state level that reveals the underlying discrimination that motivated the law.

Featured Article


The Year the GOPs Con Game was Exposed

The GOP’s decision to reinstate tax cut policy in 2001 exposed their hand. It was not about deficit reduction, growing the economy, or job creation. It was about ideology and, no doubt, special interests. It was a backdoor approach where government revenue was cut in an attempt to curtail spending on popular programs they otherwise could not take head-on. This while obstructing the work of Congress, spinning a web of deceit about the benefits of their policy, and weakening our country’s financial standing. It’s time to play hardball during ‘fiscal cliff’ negotiations and force them to be specific about what spending cuts they are talking about to offset the tax benefits they wish to preserve for the wealthiest. They wouldn’t have the nerve.