Healthcare Reform Death Panels? The Tables Turned

Oct 21, 2009   //   Healthcare, Politics

The ‘death panel’ tactic by opponents of healthcare reform was offensive and a scare tactic.  It was a manipulation of proposed legislation and an absurdity to believe that legislators and the President of this country would be involved in a diabolical plot to pull the plug on our older citizens.  However, if that is the way some opponents of healthcare reform want to fight, let’s give them a ‘dose of their own medicine’.  My son, Kelly, and I discussed this matter the other evening and concluded, as have others, that the tables are too easily turned.

The Odds of Developing Serious Life-Threatening Illness Increase As We Get Older

Most people are aware of this.  As but one example, the odds of developing cancer increase the older we get.

Age is a Factor in Raising Health Insurance Premiums

As one gets older health insurance premiums get more expensive.  For example, between ages 55 and 60 my premium (I am self-employed) has increased 150% to keep the same level of benefits.  Not all can afford this.  Such increases in cost can force individuals to reduce benefits or even price them out of the market when they need health insurance the most.  Additionally, individuals who have serious pre-existing conditions can be denied coverage or be priced out as well.

Lack of Health Insurance is Claiming 45,000 Lives a Year in the US.

The recent study published out of Harvard Medical School shows that in our country 45,000 lives/year (one every 12 minutes) is lost because of lack of health insurance.  The loss of life from lack of health insurance is greater than that from drunk driving and homicide combined.  American adults age 64 and younger who lack health insurance have a 40% higher risk of death than those who have coverage.

So if opponents of healthcare reform want to discuss Death Panels, do not they not already exist in the insurance companies where decisions are made to deny coverage to those with serious pre-existing conditions?  Or where decisions are made to raise premiums as our citizens age that can price them out of the market or cause them to reduce benefits when they need health insurance the most?  Are they not in essence ‘pulling the plug’ on some of our citizens as they get older, even resulting in loss of life in some cases?

So, Mrs. Palin and others who have been involved with the ‘Death Panel’ tactic, be careful how you fight.  Your own tactics can be turned on you.  Why would we not want an option for those citizens whose lives are being endangered because they have become a profit risk to an industry?

Recent Posts

The Cruelty of NCs House Bill 2

North Carolina’s House Bill 2 is fundamentally flawed. Quite the opposite of legislators bogus claims that public facility non-discrimination laws create safety concerns from sexual predators, the law actually increases the risk of abuse, both verbal and physical, to the already vulnerable transgender population. Further, in the state of NC that houses the Research Triangle Park and multiple world class medical institutions, legislators have pandered to religious factions and organizations that have stigmatized, ostracized and even demonized transgenders, some of whom suffer from a recognized medical diagnosis. The situation for transgendered youth is particularly grave, a population that already suffers a high rate of both abuse and suicide attempts. The law is cruel and untenable from both business and civil/human rights perspectives, and should be repealed.

NC’s Anti-LGBT Law and the Legislature: Little Business Sense

In this published Letter to the Editor (Raleigh N&O), powerful members of the North Carolina legislature have demonstrated little understanding of the importance of customer retention in building the business base of the state.

North Carolina’s LGBT Discrimination Law HB2: Its Folly and Motivation

By using sex on a birth certificate to define sexual identity, NC’s legislature and governor have shown much ignorance about the complexities of biologic diversity. But it is the pandering to LGBT hate groups by ranking members of the GOP at both the national and state level that reveals the underlying discrimination that motivated the law.

Featured Article

The Year the GOPs Con Game was Exposed

The GOP’s decision to reinstate tax cut policy in 2001 exposed their hand. It was not about deficit reduction, growing the economy, or job creation. It was about ideology and, no doubt, special interests. It was a backdoor approach where government revenue was cut in an attempt to curtail spending on popular programs they otherwise could not take head-on. This while obstructing the work of Congress, spinning a web of deceit about the benefits of their policy, and weakening our country’s financial standing. It’s time to play hardball during ‘fiscal cliff’ negotiations and force them to be specific about what spending cuts they are talking about to offset the tax benefits they wish to preserve for the wealthiest. They wouldn’t have the nerve.